🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.