🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the current era. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.