🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with public health regulations. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “following international guideline limits”, delayed for at least twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch claims the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, noting that underage people should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which includes increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.